Talk:2024 Cumberland book ban
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge into main Cumberland City Council article
[edit]C-Class article of low-importance a standalone on Wikipedia, and Cumberland City Council article already has a section with several paragraphs on the matter. This article while newsworthy is reflective of a blog post rather than an encyclopaedia article. ThelmaThompson45 (talk) 11:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean by “a standalone article on Wikipedia”? -- NotCharizard 🗨 17:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Ban had pretty significant coverage and I think it can stand on its own, there may be further coverage as an aftermath with the council elections next month as well Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 10:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose Yes, the coverage was very significant and it went for a few months. It was reported statewide and also nationwide in national media outlets. Moreover, this was the most prominent LGBT controversy in Australia, hence the article is very important. Yucalyptus (talk) 09:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. First LGBT book ban in Australia apparently inspired by the US. Well sourced and notable article. MarkiPoli (talk) 10:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class New South Wales articles
- Low-importance New South Wales articles
- WikiProject New South Wales articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- C-Class Freedom of speech articles
- Low-importance Freedom of speech articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- Low-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles